Bryan Haywood

The proposed rule would require Workplace Emergency Response Employers (WEREs) and Emergency Service Organizations (ESOs) to develop and implement a written comprehensive risk management plan based on the type and level of service(s) that would be established: Paragraph (c) Organization of the WERT, and Establishment of the ERP and Emergency Service(s) Capability and Paragraph (d) […]

To be effective, any safety and health program needs the meaningful participation of workers and their representatives. Similarly, for the Emergency Response Program (ERP) to be effective, team members and responders need to be involved in establishing, operating, evaluating, and improving the ERP. Team members and responders have much to gain from a successful program

Workplace Emergency Response Employers (WEREs) and Emergency Services Organizations (ESOs) respond to a wide variety of incidents, most of which are considered routine and involve a small commitment of resources. Some incidents are more complex and involve larger commitments of resources and potentially higher-risk operations. The WERE and ESO need to develop an incident management

The use of Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) helps to reduce the risk of injuries and fatalities by providing written guidance to team members and responders with established safe procedures for actions to be taken during a wide variety of incident responses. They provide direction for team members and responders on what they need to do

This is a long time coming.  OSHA referenced the use of EPCRA’s Tier II’s in this section; something that has been in place since 1986!  For those of you who have stressed over my lengthy and detailed PSM/RMP audit findings regarding emergency planning and response – you’re welcome.  Closing out those findings means you are

During emergency incident operations, team members and responders face the most challenging aspects, both physically and psychologically, of their vocation.Ensuring safe operations at incidents can reduce team member and responder injuries and fatalities and limit exposure to health hazards. Paragraph (p) of the proposed rule is based on current industry practices, as reflected by NFPA

Proposed paragraph (i) provides requirements to ensure that Workplace Emergency Response Employers (WEREs) facilities are safe for team members. Paragraph (i)(1)(i) of the proposed rule would require WEREs to ensure their facilities comply with 29 CFR 1910 Subpart E, Exit Routes and Emergency Planning.  This proposed provision is not a new requirement because WEREs are

As noted in the Summary and Explanation for proposed paragraph (a) Scope, the proposed rule would not apply to any employer that is not an Emergency Service Organization (ESO) and does not have a Workplace Emergency Response Team (WERT). Nothing in this proposed rule would require an employer to establish a WERT. Each employer makes