Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)

Do the quantities of two separate vessels that are interconnected with a closed valve need to be aggregated for the worst-case release scenario analysis?

Pursuant to the risk management program regulations, facilities must perform an offsite consequence analysis for the worst-case release scenario. Do the quantities of two separate vessels that are interconnected with a closed valve need to be aggregated for the worst-case release scenario analysis? 

Are mechanical controls such as alarms considered administrative controls and therefore limit the worst-case release quantity?

For the purpose of analyzing the worst-case release scenario required as part of the hazard assessment at 40 CFR Part 68, Subpart B, the worst-case release quantity is identified as the greatest amount held in a single vessel or pipe, taking into account administrative controls that limit the maximum quantity (40 CFR §68.25(b)). Are mechanical

More on the limitations of Excess Flow Valves – 9 out 10 times they may let you down when you really need them

Yes… here we go again!  If we wish to claim an Excess Flow Valve as a “layer of protection” against a hose/pipe failure, we then MUST ensure the device is SIZED properly, INSTALLED properly, OPERATED properly, and MAINTAINED properly.  This is what is called process safety management and for the life of me, I just

Safety Advisory: Effects of additives in anhydrous ammonia nurse tanks or delivery tanks (Transport Canada)

In 2017 and 2019 I wrote about these Nitrogen Stabilizers and how their introduction into a PSM/RMP covered process would require a MOC and PSSR and I broke down the potential concerns and questions regarding these additives.  Now it seems there may be a Mechanical Integrity twist to the use of these additives, as Transport

EAPs and Procedures to be followed by employees who remain to operate critical plant operations before they evacuate (1910.38(c)(3))

If there is one common finding in our PSM/RMP audits it is this single requirement for employees who remain to operate critical plant operations before they evacuate.  And when we attempt to explain what is actually necessary to just meet 1910.38(c)(3) we are oftentimes met with downright hostility.  It is rare these days that anyone

Scroll to Top