Hazardous Materials

Are forklift charging areas “hazardous locations” due to hydrogen off-gassing?

Forklift battery charging areas are NOT automatically classified as Hazardous (Classified) Locations, but they can easily become one if ventilation is inadequate. And I have seen more charging areas without engineered ventilation than I have with the proper ventilation. The hazardous classification hinges entirely on the facility’s ability to prevent the accumulation of hydrogen gas. […]

Nurse Tank Safety and Compliance Advisory letter (2008 Reminder)

  Based on eight (8) recent enforcement investigations, conducted by the U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Office of Hazardous Materials Enforcement (OHME), this letter is intended to notify the industry of serious safety problems and non-compliance issues regarding the maintenance, filling, transport and use of nurse tanks in anhydrous

What chemicals require hydrostatic relief valves on piping?

While virtually any liquid trapped in a “blocked-in” section of pipe can cause a rupture due to thermal expansion, specific chemicals are strictly regulated by OSHA 1910.119 (PSM) and NFPA 30 because of their volatility or toxicity. The requirement for a hydrostatic relief valve (HRV) is generally triggered by the chemical’s physical state (liquefied under

BLEVE Hazad Zones

Immediate Lethal Zone — Fireball Radius Typical range: 160–820 ft Hazards: Used for: absolute exclusion zone. Severe Burn Zone — High Thermal Radiation Typical range: 820–1,300 ft Thermal radiation: ~12.5–37.5 kW/m² Effects: Used for: firefighter withdrawal line unless cooling operations are effective. Moderate Burn Zone — Pain/Blistering Typical range: 1,300–2,600 ft Thermal radiation: ~5–12.5 kW/m²

The roles of Visual Inspector & Examiner in B31.3 piping

To understand what certification is needed for the visual examination of welds under ASME B31.3, it is critical to distinguish between the two (2) distinct roles defined by the Code:1) the Examiner and2) the Inspector While in fact, B31.3 requires 100% visual examination of fabrication (341.4.1), the “certification” depends on which of these two roles

Is “grounding” or “bonding” or BOTH “grounding & bonding” to safely transfer flammable liquids?

I am sure this article will ruffle a few feathers, but honestly, I am surprised and disappointed by that. But I do a lot of work in flammable liquid processing, and this topic always comes up during audits, PHAs, and accident investigations. Some folks will swear that only grounding is “required.” They get this from

Understanding why “bonding and grounding” may not be enough protection when handling non-conductive flammable liquids

In the world of flammable liquids processing, we have two (2) types of flammable liquids: Members can read all my articles on how these flammable liquids get classified as “conductive” vs. “non-conductive. This post is to explain HOW and WHY the traditional “bonding and grounding” used in the transfer of flammable liquids may be inadequate

Why does OSHA’s 1910.146 require O2 to be sampled first?

Before an employee enters the space, the internal atmosphere shall be tested, with a calibrated direct-reading instrument, for oxygen content, for flammable gases and vapors, and for potential toxic air contaminants, in that order. We test for oxygen before testing for flammability (LEL) for two (2) critical reasons: Here is the breakdown of why this

How often do hydrostatic relief valves (HRV) have to be changed or tested?

The frequency for testing or replacing hydrostatic relief valves (HRVs) depends largely on the service environment, the fluid being handled, and the specific regulatory standards like OSHA, NFPA, CGA, or ASME governing your process. Because these valves are designed to protect against thermal expansion in liquid-filled lines—often in “blocked-in” sections—their reliability is critical to preventing

Scroll to Top