EPA recently issued two citations to a juice processing facility for failing to comply with the amended requirements in 40 C.F.R. § 68.93(a) & (c). On March 21, 2022, an incident at the ammonia refrigeration facility resulted in an accidental release (the “Incident “). Pursuant to Section 114 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7414, […]
Respondent has a refining process meeting the definition of “process”, as defined by 40 C.F.R. § 68.3. Methane, ethane, propane, pentane, propylene, hydrogen, butane, hydrogen sulfide, and ammonia are each a “regulated substance” pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 68.3. The threshold quantity for methane, ethane, propane, pentane, propylene, hydrogen, butane, hydrogen · sulfide, and ammonia
Several organizational characteristics can feed organizational silence: Managerial illusions: managers can believe that the situation is under control simply because of the number of procedures. They can also believe that failure to follow a procedure is the only possible mechanism that can produce accidents. This discourages feedback about situations where procedures are difficult, time-consuming, or
It is commonly admitted that the great majority of industrial accidents are caused directly by specific unsafe acts of persons or exposure to specific mechanical or physical hazards. It is agreed that these causes and the accidents that they create interfere seriously with the quality, volume, and cost of production and are of a preventable
The client this week had such an eye-opening experience with the risk assessment yesterday; they were all early this morning and had written out their homework assignment for the night! We took their loading docks and did the OSH version of LOPA called a Hierarchal Analysis around workers being crushed by a trailer at the
As safety pros return to work this week from the annual ASSP conference last week, their excitement and enthusiasm will either blossom or bottom out. So many new techniques are being pushed in the safety arena these days, and many safety pros and management personnel are grasping for whatever it takes to turn their safety
We are all familiar with OSHA’s LOTO Periodic Inspection requirements (1910.147(c)(6)). It is a topic of great debate, still in the Year 2023. But there is a serious, I say it is a fatal flaw in the periodic inspection process. It is common for this activity to be performed by managers/supervisors who are authorized in
When people say, “safety is just common sense,” I wish we could slap them. Working for a client in KY, I have identified so much that is different between their state plan and the federal OSHA requirements. Some of the differences just do not make sense and I am sure there are some political forces
As with some state plans, KY-OSHA has some standards that are more in-depth than the federal version. Although, a couple of years ago, the KY legislature passed a bill that restricts KY-OSHA from adopting any standards that are more stringent than federal OSHA. But for now, KY-OSHA’s 1st Aid standard goes much further than federal
Where an employee is confronted with a choice between not performing assigned tasks or being subjected to death or serious injury arising from a dangerous condition at the workplace, such employee may refuse in good faith to expose himself/herself to the dangerous condition. The condition causing the employee’s apprehension of death or injury must be
A “Hazardous liquid” means, for the purpose of this regulation, a chemical or mixture of chemicals that is toxic, an irritant, corrosive, a strong oxidizer, a strong sensitizer,combustible, flammable, extremely flammable, dangerously reactive or pressure generating or which otherwise may cause substantial personal injury or substantial illness during, or as a direct result of any
I am not trying to start another LOTO fight about Lockout vs Tagout, but for those who do work in the state of KY, it is important to know that KY-OSHA does NOT allow an employer to utilize TAGOUT when the device can accept a lock. This is different than what Federal OSHA allows. Federal
