We debated this topic a couple of years back and although I am not sure we came to an agreement, I was, still am, set on the idea that 1910.146(c)(5) and (c)(7) can NOT be used simultaneously on the same PRCS. In other words, the PRCS either qualifies for (c)(5) entry or (c)(7) entry; or…...
As it usually goes, the vast majority of challenges and questions I have received thus far from yesterday’s ASSP2019! Presentation centered around the most controversial characteristic of 1910.146… 4. Contains any other recognized serious safety or health hazard I could have spent half a day talking about this single characteristic, but I had only 35…...
SAFTENG Members can get a sneak peek at our presentation before Wednesday. Come and see Jonathan and I present our Top 10 Myths and Misconceptions or to just say Hi and catch up. Misconception #1 1910.146 applies ONLY to General Industry workplaces and 1926.1201-.1213 applies ONLY to Construction worksites Misconception #2 Anyone…...
… Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership LevelsAlready a member? Log in here...
This video was one of my “Video of the Week” videos from years ago, but since I get so many request for it I posted it in the PRCS section…. Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership LevelsAlready a member? Log in here...
OSHA defines entry as: “Entry” means the action by which a person passes through an opening into a permit-required confined space. Entry includes ensuing work activities in that space and is considered to have occurred as soon as any part of the entrant’s body breaks the plane of an opening into the space. Here is…...
This is a reminder that despite decades of work by to improve confined space entry by maritime safety organizations, training institutions, and vessel owners/operators, the risks have NOT BEEN ELIMINATED. This is illustrated by a recent casualty where three (3) persons were asphyxiated while working onboard a laid-up Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU). Although the investigation is not…...
February 6, 2019 MEMORANDUM FOR: REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS STATE PLAN DESIGNEESTHROUGH: KURT A. PETERMEYER …...
At approximately 2:30 p.m. on April 1, 2010, Employee #1, Employee #2 (leadman) and Employee #3 were preparing product involving the use of fermented molasses as one of the ingredients. The workers were having problems moving the molasses from tank #2 to tank #1. According to the employer, he told Employee #2 via telephone, to…...
Select the link “Submit a Public Input” to review the document and make any suggested revisions. You will be asked to sign-in or create a free online account with NFPA before using this system. If you have any questions when using the system, a chat feature is available, or contact us by email at [email protected]…...
OSHA has cited an asphalt paving contractor after an employee suffered fatal injuries after being pulled into an unguarded slat/drag conveyor at the company’s North Platte, Nebraska, asphalt plant. OSHA proposed penalties totaling $89,032. OSHA cited the company for seven serious violations of machine guarding, lockout/tagout and permit-required confined space standards, including failing to develop a…...
This is one type of situation where (c)(5) could be a means to enter a PRCS and OSHA agreed and issued some (c)(5) citations. At 8:15 p.m. on May 25, 2018, Employee #1 was power washing the outside of the semi-truck tanker trailer. The employee entered the tanker trailer to wash the inside and was…...
