Bryan Haywood

RMP Facilities in the United States as of December 2009

Under the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r), the EPA established a program requiring facilities possessing greater than certain threshold quantities of 140 chemicals to provide risk management plans to the EPA.1  As part of this reporting requirement, facilities are required to determine the worst-case scenario release from a single chemical process, using EPA criteria and guidelines.2 Facilities…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Establishing a Reporting Culture (Psychological Safety)

It cannot be assumed that workers will naturally begin to report problems, errors, and near misses once a just environment is in place. There are a number of organizational as well as psychological barriers that must be hurdled before a reporting culture can be put in place.   The first barrier to overcome is… Membership Required...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Externally vs. Internally illuminated EXIT signs

In older facilities, we see illumination for an exit sign coming from an external source.  Section 1013.6 of the IBC regulates the graphics, illumination, and emergency power supply for such signs. Although no particular color is specified for exit signs, it is REQUIRED that the color and design of the signs, the lettering, the arrows,…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Dr. Dekker’s “Two views on Human Error”

Dr. Sidney Dekker (Ph.D. in Cognitive Systems Engineering) states there are basically two (2) ways of looking at human error. In this article, I share with you, the first view, which could be called “the bad apple theory“. It maintains that:… Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership LevelsAlready a...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Reason’s 3 C’s

Three (3) ingredients are vital for driving the safety engine, all of them the province of top management or what the organizational theorist, Mintzberg, has termed the strategic apex of the system. These driving forces are: commitment, competence and cognizance Reason’s three C’s…. Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

De-enerizing Stored Energies

Take any of the following steps below that may be necessary to guard against stored energy(s) left in the equipment after it has been shut down and isolated from its energy source(s)…. Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership LevelsAlready a member? Log in here...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

A reverse look at Facility Siting and Change Management

An older post, with updates…Ever since the 2005 BP Texas City tragedy, refineries and chemical plants have been working diligently to review “facility siting” risks for their facilities.  As with all of the PSM elements, many of us took this new focus as a learning opportunity.  We had all done something we called “facility siting”…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

PSM and RMP (e.g HAZMAT) Pipe Supports… how many and how far?

As we have discussed here many times, our piping is our “primary containment” that seems to be where the vast majority of Loss of Primary Containment (LOPC) events occur. Many reasons for this, which we have spelled out in other postings, but none the less the vast majority of “leaks” occur in our piping. One…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Management of Organizational Change (OSHA Letter to RAs)

March 31, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR:     REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS THROUGH:        DONALD G. SHALHOUB DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY   FROM:                RICHARD E. FAIRFAX, DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT PROGRAMS  SUBJECT:          Management of Organizational Change This memorandum addresses the application of 29 CFR 1910.119 (l), Process Safety Management (PSM) – Management of Change (MOC), to…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

The strategic approach to improving Human Performance

The strategic approach to improving human performance within safety embraces two (2) primary challenges: Anticipate, Prevent, Catch, and Recover from ACTIVE errors Identify and Eliminate LATENT organizational weaknesses that provoke human error and degrade controls against error and the consequences of error Preventable errors will not be eliminated if opportunities to err are not methodically…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA Can Improve Implementation of the Risk Management Program for Airborne Chemical Releases (EPA OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL)

EPA can improve its program management and oversight to better assure that facilities covered by the Clean Air Act’s Risk Management Program submit or re-submit an RMP. EPA had not established national procedures for identifying covered facilities that had not submitted RMPs. For the 5 States reviewed, we identified 48 facilities in 3 States that…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top