Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)

Is IFC 2021 Performance-Based Design Alternative better than OSHA’s PSM and EPA’s RMP?

For several editions, the IFC has incorporated a “Performance-Based Design Alternative” to comply with the requirements of Part V—Hazardous Materials (Chapters 50-67).  This was initially added so that facilities already doing PSM/RMP could show compliance with the state fire code without any additional work. In the 2021 edition of the IFC, this alternative has been […]

EPA’s 2022 RMP Activity

In FY 2022, the agency continued its efforts to reduce risks of accidental releases at industrial and chemical facilities, such as: Concluded three (3) judicial actions, 145 administrative penalty actions, and 18 administrative compliance orders In FY 2022, EPA renewed its presence in the field and increased its on-site inspections by more than 150% compared to

“An engineer’s view of human error” (Third edition – Trevor Kletz)

Mr. Trevor Kletz is, without a doubt, my favorite author.  In 2001 he published his book on Human Factors in process safety – “An engineer’s view of human error” (Third edition).  It is a MUST-READ for those who practice process safety, significantly if you facilitate process hazard(s) analysis (PHA), including the Human Factors analysis.  His

OSHA updates their PSM-VPP questionnaire

Over the last several years, OSHA has asked, in the annual Supplement B questionnaire, specific questions designed to help share information about the site’s safety and health management systems (SHMS), but mainly about the critical areas of PSM programs and established procedures used to maintain, collect, and analyze PSM systems/process metrics. In 2016, OSHA developed

Process Venting to a “safe location” (Part II)

Last month I posted Exhaust Ventilation for Flammable Atmospheres and “Safe Locations” to explain the hazards of not controlling our flammable vapors associated with the required exhaust ventilation.  I received several comments and questions on that article regarding the normal process of venting hazardous materials and how to best define a “safe location” for these

“Weep Holes” are a requirement with a 3-prong alternative as back-up design (ASME Section VIII, Div 1,UG-136)

I am always amazed to hear people complain about the degree of our auditing.  Most clients hire us for detailed auditing, but some see the PSM/RMP 3-year audits as a “check-the-box” exercise and do not appreciate our auditing skills and experience (LOL).  Comments/Questions like… “Would OSHA really cite for that?” are commonplace.  Let me be

Process Safety and LOCTITE®

I can not think of a single business that operated and maintained a PSM/RMP-covered process that did not utilize LOCTITE®.  It is a beautiful product; however, it may be the most overused and abused product within the covered process.  When used PROPERLY and per Henkel’s instructions, the product works well.  But like most really good

Scroll to Top